http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-27/rosneft-says-exxon-arctic-well-strikes-oil.html
Russia’s state-run OAO Rosneft said a well drilled in the Kara Sea region of the Arctic Ocean with Exxon Mobil Corp. struck oil, showing the region has the potential to become one of the world’s most important crude-producing areas.
The announcement was made by Igor Sechin,
Rosneft’s chief executive officer, who spent two days sailing on a
Russian research ship to the drilling rig where the find was unveiled
today. The well found about 1 billion barrels of oil and similar geology
nearby means the surrounding area may hold more than the U.S. part of
the Gulf or Mexico, he said.
The stakes are high for Exxon, whose $408 billion market valuation makes
it the world’s largest energy producer. Russia represents the
second-biggest exploration prospect worldwide. The Irving, Texas-based
company holds drilling rights across 11.4 million acres in Russia, only
eclipsed by its 15.1 million U.S. acres."
Adica liderii mondiali stabilesc la ONU ca trebuie sa reducem de urgenta poluarea daca vrem sa evitam producerea in scurt timp a unui dezastru general de proportii incalculabile, iar corporatii de toate natiile isi vad de explorat si forat ca si cum omenirea ar avea mare nevoie de petrol?
Oamenii astia sunt autisti? Nu au vazut si ei la stiri ca omenirii ii trebuie alte surse de energie?
Am descoperit, cred, o noua cauza pentru autism: profitul.
Propun, in acest caz, ca EXXON, etc. sa ii despagubeasca pe toti cei care vor fi afectati de uragane, inundatii, cutremure, etc.
Pentru ce mai forati dupa petrol? Pentru ce?
Si o sa imi raspund singura. Pentru ca exista cumparatori pentru aceasta marfa si ea nu a fost interzisa.
Exista benzinarii, exista soferi care se urca in fiecare zi (poate chiar de mai multe ori pe zi) la volanul unui automobil si pun benzina in rezervorul care o trimite motorului, care o arde pentru a-l transporta la destinatie, ardere care produce gaze toxice eliberate in aer, si asta de la miliarde de masini, zilnic.
Ce e de facut?
Eitherway, someone should break the news to these guys, that their services are no longer required.
P.S. Se pare ca totusi exista constiinta si responsabilitate si la acest nivel : dezinvestire (divesting), adica a retrage capitalul investit intr-un domeniu. Rockefeller. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/21/rockefellers-fossil-fuels-climate-change_n_5859042.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular,climate-change
Si Mark Ruffalo & the Avengers impotriva fracturarii hidraulice si a combustibililor fosili.
"Brands investments in carbon-polluting entities as immoral." http://motherboard.vice.com/read/mark-ruffalo-wants-the-avengers-to-divest-from-fossil-fuels
Cred ca si asta merge aici, chiar daca ne face schizofrenia sa arate mai urat decat arata deja http://www.ecomagazin.ro/raportul-planeta-vie-2014-avem-mai-putin-de-jumatate-dintre-pasarile-mamiferele-si-amfibienii-de-acum-40-de-ani/
RăspundețiȘtergereV
poate totusi nu atat de urata: https://secure.avaaz.org/ro/climate_march_reportback/?bQdpmeb&v=47159
RăspundețiȘtergere:P
V
Nu atat de urata, dar nu simpla. Nu exista consens: http://www.ecomagazin.ro/studiu-omul-partial-vinovat-de-intensificarea-valurilor-de-caldura-din-2013/
RăspundețiȘtergereV